The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6119•United States of America v. Andrew Charles Jackson, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky Antonio Bady, a/k/a Sway
16-6119Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 23, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6119
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANDREW CHARLES JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky
Antonio Bady, a/k/a Sway,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
District Judge. (3:00-cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1; 3:00-cr-00046-JPB-
RWT-1)
Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 23, 2016
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew Charles Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas
Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Andrew Charles Jackson appeals the district court’s order
denying his “motion to void and correct illegal sentence.” We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. 3:00-cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1;
3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 4, 2016). We deny
Jackson’s motion to void judgment and we dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.