The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6120•Michael Alonza Rufus v. United States of America
16-6120Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 7, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6120
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
District Judge. (6:15-cv-02127-MBS)
Submitted: June 29, 2016 Decided: July 7, 2016
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Alonza Rufus, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without
prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Rufus v. United States, No. 6:15-cv-02127-
MBS (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.