The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6126•United States of America v. Darryl Thomas Shields
16-6126Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 28, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6126
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARRYL THOMAS SHIELDS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:05-cr-00254-TDS-1; 1:14-cv-00552-TDS-JEP)
Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 28, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl Thomas Shields, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Michael
Meinecke, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Thomas Shields appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
Shields’ Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a purported error
in his presentence report. We have reviewed the record and
discern no error in this ruling. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. See United States v. Shields, Nos.
1:05-cr-00254-TDS-1; 1:14-cv-00552-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C. Dec. 15,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.