The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6140•United States of America v. Raphael Mendez
16-6140Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6140
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RAPHAEL MENDEZ,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:91-hc-00350-BR)
Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 26, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raphael Mendez, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Dee Dannels, FEDERAL
MEDICAL CENTER, Butner, North Carolina; Robert J. Dodson, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; David
T. Huband, Michael Lockridge, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Raphael Mendez appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion to remove his attorney. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Mendez, No. 5:91-
hc-00350-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 20, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.