The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6144•United States of America v. Wendell Antonio Johnson
16-6144Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 28, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6144
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
WENDELL ANTONIO JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
Judge. (7:04-cr-00128-MFU-1; 7:16-cv-80882-MFU-RSB)
Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 28, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wendell Antonio Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia,
Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wendell Antonio Johnson seeks to appeal the district
court’s order dismissing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a
second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion filed
without authorization. On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Johnson’s informal brief does not challenge the basis
for the district court’s disposition, Johnson has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.