The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6183•United States of America v. Tommie Raymond Thomas
16-6183Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6183
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TOMMIE RAYMOND THOMAS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
District Judge. (3:03-cr-00173-GCM-1)
Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 26, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tommie Raymond Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tommie Raymond Thomas appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to correct an alleged clerical error in his
criminal judgment. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. Because there is no
clerical error in Thomas’ criminal judgment, we affirm the district
court’s order. United States v. Thomas, No. 3:03-cr-00173-GCM-1
(W.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.