The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6185•United States of America v. Ismael Diaz Amestica, a/k/a Fidel Ramos Ramos
16-6185Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 28, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6185
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ISMAEL DIAZ AMESTICA, a/k/a Fidel Ramos Ramos,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:14-cr-00119-RBS-RJK-2)
Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 28, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ismael Diaz Amestica, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ismael Diaz Amestica appeals the district court’s order
denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion to compel a sentence
reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Amestica, No. 2:14-cr-
00119-RBS-RJK-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.