The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6214•Alexander Otis Matthews v. LIAM O'GRADY, United States District Court Judge
16-6214Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 1, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6214
ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LIAM O'GRADY, United States District Court Judge,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-01162-LMB-TCB; 1:11-cr-00348-LO-1)
Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: June 1, 2016
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander Otis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alexander Otis Matthews appeals the district court’s order
dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A)(b) (2012) his complaint
filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and the court’s orders
denying Matthews’ multiple motions to amend. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Matthews v.
O’Grady, Nos. 1:15-cv-01162-LMB-TCB, 1:11-cr-00348-LO-1 (E.D.
Va. Feb. 2 & 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.