The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6222•United States of America v. Michael Demond Oglesby
16-6222Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 25, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6222
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL DEMOND OGLESBY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:06-cr-00348-TDS-1)
Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 25, 2016
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Demond Oglesby, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael
Hamilton, Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Randall Stuart Galyon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Demond Oglesby appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Oglesby,
No. 1:06-cr-00348-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.