The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6232•United States of America v. Naarl Joseph Richard, a/k/a Noel H. Richard, a/k/a Richard Earl, a/k/a Richard Narrl
16-6232Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 29, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6232
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NAARL JOSEPH RICHARD, a/k/a Noel H. Richard, a/k/a Richard
Earl, a/k/a Richard Narrl,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (2:09-cr-00992-PMD-1)
Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 29, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Naarl Joseph Richard, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan S. Williams,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Naarl Joseph Richard appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Richard, No. 2:09-cr-00992-PMD-1 (D.S.C.
Jan. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.