The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6241•United States of America v. Antonio Lamont Nicholson
16-6241Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 1, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6241
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTONIO LAMONT NICHOLSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:07-cr-00045-FL-1)
Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: June 1, 2016
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Lamont Nicholson, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Dickerson
Kocher, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Lamont Nicholson appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Contrary to Nicholson’s assertion on appeal, our
decision in United States v. Williams, 808 F.3d 253 (4th Cir.
2015), does not apply. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Nicholson, No.
5:07-cr-00045-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 25, 2016). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.