Gregory Vincent Smith v. CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS; CPL TWILSON, Tick; PEGGY E. SPIVEY; CRYSTAL HODGE; JIM MATTHEWS

16-6344Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 1, 2016

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6344
GREGORY VINCENT SMITH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS; CPL T WILSON, Tick; PEGGY E. SPIVEY;
CRYSTAL HODGE; JIM MATTHEWS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-03161-RBH)
Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: June 1, 2016
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Vincent Smith, Appellant Pro Se. H. Thomas Morgan, Jr.,
Larry Shawn Sullivan, DUBOSE-ROBINSON, P.C., Camden, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Vincent Smith appeals the district court’s orders
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Smith v. Phillips, No. 1:14-cv-03161-RBH
(D.S.C. Feb. 2 & Mar. 3, 2016). We also deny Smith’s motion to
assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.