The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6344•Gregory Vincent Smith v. CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS; CPL TWILSON, Tick; PEGGY E. SPIVEY; CRYSTAL HODGE; JIM MATTHEWS
16-6344Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 1, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6344
GREGORY VINCENT SMITH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS; CPL T WILSON, Tick; PEGGY E. SPIVEY;
CRYSTAL HODGE; JIM MATTHEWS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-03161-RBH)
Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: June 1, 2016
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Vincent Smith, Appellant Pro Se. H. Thomas Morgan, Jr.,
Larry Shawn Sullivan, DUBOSE-ROBINSON, P.C., Camden, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Vincent Smith appeals the district court’s orders
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Smith v. Phillips, No. 1:14-cv-03161-RBH
(D.S.C. Feb. 2 & Mar. 3, 2016). We also deny Smith’s motion to
assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.