The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6366•Chastis Nixon v. JOHN DOE, Superintendent of Salisbury Correctional Institution
16-6366Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 22, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6366
CHASTIS NIXON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN DOE, Superintendent of Salisbury Correctional
Institution; JOHN DOE, II, Superintendent of Alexander
Correctional Institution; GASTON COUNTY MUNICIPALITY; GASTON
COUNTY JAIL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief
District Judge. (3:15-cv-00370-FDW)
Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 22, 2016
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chastis Ray Gomez Nixon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Chastis Nixon seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
granting his motion to amend his complaint and dismissing without
prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action for failure to comply
with the court’s order to file an amended complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nixon v.
Doe, No. 3:15-cv-00370-FDW (W.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2016; May 5, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.