The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6423•Chester Lambert Lilley, Jr. v. ANDREW WARREN; CRAIG DANCY, Lt.
16-6423Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 1, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6423
CHESTER LAMBERT LILLEY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANDREW WARREN; CRAIG DANCY, Lt.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (5:16-cv-00030-FDW)
Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: June 1, 2016
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chester Lambert Lilley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Chester Lambert Lilley, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order and judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint for failing to state a claim under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Lilley v. Warren, No. 5:16-cv-00030-FDW
(W.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2016). We deny Lilley’s motions for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.