The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6463•United States of America v. ROBERT LEE WINFIELD, JR., a/k/a Tubbs
16-6463Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 29, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6463
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBERT LEE WINFIELD, JR., a/k/a Tubbs,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert E. Payne, Senior District
Judge. (2:95-cr-00193-REP-1)
Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 29, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Lee Winfield, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Kosky, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia; Stephen David
Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia;
Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport
News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Lee Winfield, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Winfield, No. 2:95-cr-00193-REP-
1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.