The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-6682•United States of America v. Ronald Doerrer
16-6682Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 22, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6682
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RONALD DOERRER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (7:14-cr-00013-FL-1)
Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 22, 2016
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Doerrer, Appellant Pro Se. Evan Rikhye, Assistant United
States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Joshua Bryan Royster,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Doerrer appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to quash writ of garnishment. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
marginal order of the district court. United States v. Doerrer,
No. 7:14-cr-00013-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. May 9, 2016). Doerrer’s motion
for injunctive relief pending appeal is denied as moot. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.