Edward Dane Jeffus v. Stephanie Hollembaek

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7659
EDWARD DANE JEFFUS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
STEPHANIE HOLLEMBAEK,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-hc-02240-D)
Submitted: April 18, 2017 Decided: April 21, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Dane Jeffus, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Edward Dane Jeffus appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
motion for relief from the court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed
in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jeffus v. Hollembaek, No.
5:15-hc-02240-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --