The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-7706•William Scott Davis, Ii v. State of N.c.
16-7706Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 4, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7706
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF N.C.; COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGICAL RESOURCE; HAMPTON
ROADS MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATES; CITY OF HAMPTON; HONNELY
DSS-CPS WCHS-CPS; MIKE EASLY, NC Governor; BEVERLY PARDIC,
NC Governor; PAT MCCORY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:16-cv-00549-MSD-DEM)
Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 4, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Scott Davis, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, II, appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil rights action for failure to state a claim
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed
in forma pauperis, deny Davis’ motions to remand and to dismiss
for lack of jurisdiction, and dismiss the appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court. Davis v. North Carolina, No.
2:16−cv−00549−MSD−DEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2016). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.