The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1029•In re: Michael S. Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
17-1029Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 5, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1029
In Re: MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(7:16-cv-00455-JLK-RSB; 7:16-cv-00522-JLK-RSB; 7:16-cv-00544-JLK-RSB)
Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 5, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael S. Gorbey, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael S. Gorbey petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has
unduly delayed acting on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motions for reconsideration. He seeks
an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district
court’s dockets reveals that the district court entered orders on January 3, 2017, denying
the three motions identified in Gorbey’s petition. Accordingly, because the district court
has recently decided Gorbey’s motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.