The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1119•William Scott Davis, Jr. v. W. Earl Britt
17-1119Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 30, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1119
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
W. EARL BRITT; JAMES C. FOX; JAMES C. DEVER, III; LOUISE W.
FLANAGAN; TERRENCE W. BOYLE; MALCOLM J. HOWARD; JAMES C.
GATES; REBECCA BEACH SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (5:16-ct-03211-BA)
Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 30, 2017
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order rejecting his
postjudgment filings as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Britt,
No. 5:16-ct-03211-BA (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 2016). We deny all of Davis’ pending
motions, including his motions to remand and to appoint a guardian ad litem. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.