The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1304•Robert Lauter v. Glaxosmithkline
17-1304Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 22, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1304
ROBERT LAUTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GLAXOSMITHKLINE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00716-AWA-RJK)
Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 22, 2017
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Lauter, Appellant Pro Se. Richard J. Cromwell, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP,
Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Lauter appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack
of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lauter v.
GlaxoSmithKline, No. 2:16-cv-00716-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. Mar. 3, 2017). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.