The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1460•Lisha Austin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.a.; Samuel I. White, P.c.; U. S. Bank National Association
17-1460Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 22, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1460
LISHA AUSTIN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C.; U. S. BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Robert John Krask, Magistrate Judge. (2:16-cv-00086-RJK)
Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 22, 2017
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lisha Austin, Appellant Pro Se. Christy Lee Murphy, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC,
Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lisha Austin appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint with
prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues
raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Austin’s informal brief
does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Austin has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430
n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.