The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1598•Manekin Construction LLC v. Dana S. Lecompte
17-1598Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 21, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1598
MANEKIN CONSTRUCTION LLC,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DANA S. LECOMPTE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:16-cv-03119-RDB)
Submitted: December 19, 2017 Decided: December 21, 2017
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jay B. Shuster, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Maria Ellena Chavez-Ruark, SAUL
EWING ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dana S. LeCompte appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy
court’s order granting Manekin Construction LLC’s motion for sanctions and entering
default judgment pursuant to Bankr. R. 7037 (incorporating Fed. R. Civ. P. 37), based on
LeCompte’s failure to timely respond to discovery requests. We have reviewed the
record included on appeal and the parties’ briefs, and we find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the bankruptcy court’s order for the reasons stated by the district
court. Manekin Construction LLC v. LeCompte, No. 1:16-cv-03119-RDB (D. Md. filed
Apr. 7, 2017 & entered Apr. 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.