The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1700•Jaelen M. Wright v. Thomas Nelson Community College; Charity Hancock
17-1700Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 5, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1700
JAELEN M. WRIGHT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THOMAS NELSON COMMUNITY COLLEGE; CHARITY HANCOCK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:16-cv-00151-RGD-RJK)
Submitted: November 28, 2017 Decided: January 5, 2018
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jaelen M. Wright, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jaelen M. Wright appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint
without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because Wright cannot save his
action by amending his complaint, the district court’s order is final, and we have
jurisdiction over Wright’s appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012); Goode v. Cent. Va.
Legal Aid Soc’y, 807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Wright v. Thomas Nelson Cmty. Coll., No. 4:16-cv-00151-RGD-RJK (E.D. Va.
May 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.