The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1725•Adrienne L. McAdory v. Vail Technologies
17-1725Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 6, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1725
ADRIENNE L. MCADORY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VAIL TECHNOLOGIES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00886-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: October 19, 2017 Decided: December 6, 2017
Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adrienne L. McAdory, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Benson Young, KUTAK ROCK, LLP,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Adrienne L. McAdory appeals the district court’s order granting Vail
Technologies’ bill of costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McAdory v. Vail
Technologies, No. 1:16-cv-00886-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. June 13, 2017). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.