The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1792•Richard Polidi v. Wayne Truax, in Each of His Official
17-1792Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 21, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1792
RICHARD POLIDI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAYNE TRUAX, IN EACH OF HIS OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL
CAPACITIES; JAMES O. PAYNE, IN EACH OF HIS OFFICIAL AND
INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:17-cv-00054-WO-LPA)
Submitted: December 19, 2017 Decided: December 21, 2017
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Polidi, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richard Polidi appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Polidi v. Truax, No. 1:17-cv-00054-
WO-LPA (M.D.N.C. June 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.