The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1824•Melissa Dent v. University of Maryland
17-1824Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 24, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1824
MELISSA DENT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MD SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:16-cv-02446-DKC)
Submitted: November 14, 2017 Decided: January 24, 2018
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Melissa Dent, Appellant Pro Se. Constantine Alexander Hortis, Christopher Bowie Lord,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Melissa Dent appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment
discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Dent v.
Univ. of Md., No. 8:16-cv-02446-DKC (D. Md. June 12, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.