The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1855•In re: Catherine Denise Randolph
17-1855Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 27, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1855
In re: CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Appellant.
No. 17-2066
In re: CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, District Judge; Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:15-mc-00369)
Submitted: November 21, 2017 Decided: November 27, 2017
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appeals dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district
court’s decisions returning her complaints because they were not in compliance with the
prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.