The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1860•Harry T. Lewis v. United States Government; Honorable Richard M. Gergel; Stanley D. Ragsdale
17-1860Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 27, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1860
HARRY T. LEWIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT; HONORABLE RICHARD M. GERGEL;
STANLEY D. RAGSDALE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:17-cv-00887-DCN)
Submitted: November 21, 2017 Decided: November 27, 2017
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harry T. Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Harry T. Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint seeking the
return of property and the release of his sons from prison. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Lewis v. United States Gov’t,
No. 2:17-cv-00887-DCN (D.S.C. July 12, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.