David Matthew Harvey v. J. G. CLINE; ROBERT S. CASTLE; TYLER NELSON; SHANE WOODRUM; and TIMOTHY BROWNING

17-1903Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 11, 2018

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1903
DAVID MATTHEW HARVEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. G. CLINE; ROBERT S. CASTLE; TYLER NELSON; SHANE WOODRUM;
and TIMOTHY BROWNING,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia,
at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:15-cv-14091)
Submitted: December 28, 2017 Decided: January 11, 2018
Before KING, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lonnie C. Simmons, DITRAPANO, BARRETT, DIPIERO, MCGINLEY & SIMMONS
PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. M. Andrew Brison, Valerie F. Price,
ANSPACH MEEKS ELLENBERGER LLP, Charleston, West Virginia; Stephanie H.
Ojeda, Mark W. Browning, HENDRICKSON & LONG, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
David Matthew Harvey appeals the district court’s orders granting the Defendants’
motions to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Harvey v. Cline, No. 2:15-cv-14091 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 1, 2017; July 1, 2016;
Apr. 18, 2016); see also Magee v. Racing Corp. of W. Va., 2017 WL 4993455 (W. Va.
Nov. 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.