The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1912•James A. Clark; Helen P. Clark v. Wells Fargo Bank N.a.
17-1912Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 5, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1912
JAMES A. CLARK; HELEN P. CLARK,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:17-cv-00163-BO)
Submitted: December 28, 2017 Decided: January 5, 2018
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A. Clark and Helen P. Clark, Appellants Pro Se. B. Chad Ewing, WOMBLE BOND
DICKINSON (US) LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James A. and Helen P. Clark appeal the district court’s order dismissing their
complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to amend the informal brief and to proceed in
forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. Wells Fargo
Bank N.A., No. 5:17-cv-00163-BO (E.D.N.C. July 27, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.