The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1919•STARSHA M. SEWELL, M.Ed. v. Westat
17-1919Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 24, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1919
STARSHA M. SEWELL, M.Ed.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WESTAT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:16-cv-00158-RWT)
Submitted: January 22, 2018 Decided: January 24, 2018
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Todd James Horn, Lillian Lane Reynolds, VENABLE,
LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s orders denying three post-judgment
motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Westat, No. 8:16-cv-00158-
RWT (D. Md. July 6 & 31, 2017; Aug. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.