The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1981•Palwinder Singh v. THOMAS PATRICK GORMAN, Trustee -
17-1981Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 1, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1981
PALWINDER SINGH,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
THOMAS PATRICK GORMAN,
Trustee - Appellee,
and
USBC - ALEXANDRIA,
Party-in-Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00266-TSE-MSN)
Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 1, 2018
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Palwinder Singh, Appellant Pro Se. Marcelo Ramiro Michel, OFFICE OF THE
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Palwinder Singh appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy
court’s order dismissing his Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition. We have reviewed the record
provided on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Singh v. Gorman, No. 1:17-cv-00266-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va.
filed June 23, 2017; entered June 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.