The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-2152•Christopher Lee Johnson v. Department of Justice
17-2152Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 16, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2152
CHRISTOPHER LEE JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; FINANCIALS; DEPARTMENT OF STATE;
GOLDMAN SACHS; JP MORGAN CHASE; CITIGROUP; MORGAN
STANLEY; U. S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT; LOYD BLANK FIEN; JAMIE
DIAMON; JAMES GORMAN; U. S. FEDERAL RESERVE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (6:17-cv-01844-MGL)
Submitted: February 15, 2018 Decided: February 16, 2018
Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Lee Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Lee Johnson appeals the district court’s orders accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice
and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Johnson v. Dep’t of Justice, No. 6:17-cv-01844-MGL (D.S.C. Aug. 31 & Sept. 18,
2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.