The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-2188•Djiby Nam v. 2012, INC., d/b/a College Park Exxon
17-2188Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 16, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2188
DJIBY NAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
2012, INC., d/b/a College Park Exxon,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:17-cv-01749-PX)
Submitted: February 15, 2018 Decided: February 16, 2018
Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Djiby Nam, Appellant Pro Se. Charles H. Fleischer, OPPENHEIMER, FLEISCHER &
QUIGGLE, PC, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Djiby Nam appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action as barred
by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nam v. 2012, Inc., No.
8:17-cv-01749-PX (D. Md. Sept. 25, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.