The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-2322•Glen Roane, an individual v. United Air Lines, Inc.; Continental Airlines, Inc.
17-2322Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 5, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2322
GLEN ROANE, an individual,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED AIR LINES, INC.; CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01004-AJT-TCB)
Submitted: September 27, 2018 Decided: October 5, 2018
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne Brent Kendall, WAYNE B. KENDALL, P.C., Fayetteville, Georgia, for
Appellant. Donna M. Melby, PAUL HASTINGS LLP, Los Angeles, California, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Glen Roane appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor
of the Appellees on Roane’s claims of race discrimination, retaliation, and breach of
contract. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roane v. United Air Lines, Inc., No.
1:16-cv-01004-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. Oct. 12, 2017). We also deny the Appellees’ motion
to strike portions of Roane’s reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.