The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-2363•Gerod Stukes v. Paragon Systems, Inc.
17-2363Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2363
GEROD STUKES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00675-RAJ-RJK)
Submitted: August 23, 2018 Decided: August 27, 2018
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerod Stukes, Appellant Pro Se. Kyle Reese Elliott, Alexander Tevis Marshall,
OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gerod Stukes appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to his
former employer, Paragon Systems, Inc., and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to
alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stukes v. Paragon
Sys., Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00675-RAJ-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2017, Nov. 27, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.