The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6008•Freddie Eugene Casey v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director VADOC
17-6008Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 22, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6008
FREDDIE EUGENE CASEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director VADOC; SGT. LARGE, Correctional Sergeant;
MESSER, C/O; BARTON, C/O; MEAD, C/O; GIBSON, C/O; YOUNG, C/O;
NURSE WOOD, Institutional Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:15-cv-00689-JPJ-RSB)
Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 22, 2017
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Freddie Eugene Casey, Appellant Pro Se. Jessica Leigh Berdichevsky, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for the Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Freddie Eugene Casey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights
complaint for failure to state a claim and exhaust administrative remedies. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Casey v. Clarke, No. 7:15-cv-00689-JPJ-RSB (W.D. Va.
Dec. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.