The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6019•Ottis McGill v. JON DAVID, District Attorney; IRINE G. RIEL, Prosecutor
17-6019Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 17, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6019
OTTIS MCGILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JON DAVID, District Attorney; IRINE G. RIEL, Prosecutor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:16-ct-03079-BO)
Submitted: March 14, 2017 Decided: March 17, 2017
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ottis McGill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ottis McGill appeals the district court’s order dismissing
without prejudice* his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. McGill v. David, No. 5:15-ct-03079-
BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 7, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We conclude that the district court’s order is final and
appealable. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807
F.3d 619, 623–24, 629–30 (4th Cir. 2015).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.