The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6061•Robert S. Ballard v. Carolee Mullins; William Goodman; Ashlee Barnes
17-6061Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 31, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6061
ROBERT S. BALLARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLEE MULLINS; WILLIAM GOODMAN; ASHLEE BARNES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:15-ct-03045-H)
Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 31, 2017
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert S. Ballard, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert S. Ballard appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion
for summary judgment and dismissing Ballard’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Ballard v. Mullins, No. 5:15-ct-03045-H (E.D.N.C.
Sept. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.