The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6087•Sylvester Richardson v. R.O.S.P. MEDICAL DEPT.; DR. MILLER; SGT. PAYNE; OSBORNE, Officer; OFFICER STANLY
17-6087Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 30, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6087
SYLVESTER RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
R.O.S.P. MEDICAL DEPT.; DR. MILLER; SGT. PAYNE; OSBORNE, Officer;
OFFICER STANLY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00595-NKM-RSB)
Submitted: May 19, 2017 Decided: May 30, 2017
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sylvester Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY LAW FIRM,
PC, Dillwyn, Virginia; Jessica Leigh Berdichevsky, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sylvester Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v.
R.O.S.P. Med. Dep’t, No. 7:15-cv-00595-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. Jan. 17, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.