The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6090•United States of America v. Qualo Martez Lowery
17-6090Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 31, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6090
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
QUALO MARTEZ LOWERY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:05-cr-00216-RJC-2)
Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 31, 2017
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Qualo Martez Lowery, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States
Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, Kevin Zolot, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Qualo Martez Lowery appeals the district court’s order denying his postconviction
motion to dismiss both the indictment and the information filed by the Government
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny Lowery’s motion for the appointment of counsel and affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lowery, No. 3:05-cr-00216-
RJC-2 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.