The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6216•Ken C. Davis v. Robert McCabe; Major Spruill; Mrs. McDonald; Mrs. Jackson
17-6216Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 23, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6216
KEN C. DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT MCCABE; MAJOR SPRUILL; MRS. MCDONALD; MRS. JACKSON,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STU; HAROLD W. CLARKE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00179-MSD-LRL)
Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 23, 2017
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ken C. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Lewis Stone, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR P.C.,
Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Ken C. Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Davis’ informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Davis has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th
Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.