The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6223•United States of America v. Luis Enrique Sanchez-Castro
17-6223Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 23, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6223
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LUIS ENRIQUE SANCHEZ-CASTRO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:13-cr-00086-TDS-1)
Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 23, 2017
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luis Enrique Sanchez-Castro, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Harry L.
Hobgood, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Randall Stuart
Galyon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Luis Sanchez-Castro appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of his sentence based on Amendment 782 to the
U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Sanchez-Castro, No. 1:13-cr-00086-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 23, 2017). We deny
Sanchez-Castro’s motion for transcripts at government expense, and we dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.