The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6235•United States of America v. Joel Dallas Bonner
17-6235Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 23, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6235
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOEL DALLAS BONNER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cr-00207-JRS-1)
Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 23, 2017
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joel Dallas Bonner, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Eugene Anthony, Assistant United States
Attorney, Brian R. Hood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Richmond, Virginia; Jamie L. Mickelson, Assistant United States Attorney, Atlanta,
Georgia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joel Dallas Bonner appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of his sentence based on Amendment 782 to the
U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Bonner, No. 3:11-cr-00207-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.