The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6259•Willie Pennix v. Sgt Standford; Lt Drummond; Office of the Attorney General
17-6259Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 27, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6259
WILLIE PENNIX,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SGT STANDFORD; LT DRUMMOND; OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01643-RDB)
Submitted: June 22, 2017 Decided: June 27, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Pennix, Appellant Pro Se. Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Willie Pennix appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Pennix v. Standford, No. 1:16-cv-01643-RDB (D. Md. Feb. 16, 2017). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.