The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6285•United States of America v. William Deel, Jr.
17-6285Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 28, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6285
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM DEEL, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:09-cr-00018-JPJ-PMS-1; 1:09-cr-00022-
JPJ-PMS-1)
Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 28, 2017
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinoin.
William Deel, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Zachary T. Lee, Assistant
United States Attorneys, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Deel appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Deel, Nos. 1:09-cr-00018-JPJ-PMS-1; 1:09-cr-00022-JPJ-PMS-1 (W.D. Va. May
9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.