The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6286•United States of America v. Doretha Selby-Diggs
17-6286Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 31, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6286
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DORETHA SELBY-DIGGS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cr-00137-RBS-RJK-2)
Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 31, 2017
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Doretha Selby-Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Patrick Hudson, Assistant United States
Attorney, Newport News, Virginia; V. Kathleen Dougherty, Joseph Kosky, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Doretha Selby-Diggs appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to
compel the filing of a motion for a sentence reduction based on substantial assistance.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Selby-Diggs, No. 2:14-cr-00137-
RBS-RJK-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.