The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6335•United States of America v. Hugh Epps
17-6335Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 26, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6335
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HUGH EPPS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cr-00420-JRS-1)
Submitted: May 23, 2017 Decided: May 26, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hugh Epps, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Calvin Moore, Assistant United States Attorney,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hugh Epps appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence
reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Epps, No. 3:07-cr-00420-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.