The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-6372•Samuel E. Harris v. United States of America Department of Veterans Affairs
17-6372Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 23, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6372
SAMUEL E. HARRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:16-cv-00158-HEH-RCY)
Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 23, 2017
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel E. Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel E. Harris appeals the district court’s order denying without prejudice the
court’s dismissal without prejudice of his Federal Tort Claims Act action under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 41(b), for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Harris v. U.S. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, No. 3:16-cv-00158-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Feb.
28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.